Reconstruction designated as part of the book of abraham. Ritner, who loftily refuses to tackle any of the deeper themes of the book of abraham, including the momentous theme of ritual journey and inheritance, simply points to the names and titles now appearing on the vignettes and declares that no amount of special pleading can save joseph smiths labeling the figures as king, abraham, prince. They served as the basis for joseph smiths book of abraham, published in nauvoo, illinois, in 1842 and later canonized. Finding the truth about the book of abraham is not mysterious, complicated or impossible. Take, for example, facsimile 3, which depicts, as ritner puts it, enthroned abraham lecturing the. Egyptologist robert ritner with a devastating new takedown of the book of abraham essay update to mormonthink response. Ritner s essay was originally posted as a pdf on the institutes website. Ritner concludes, contrary to the lds position, due to the microfilms being published prior to the rediscovery of the joseph smith papyri, that it is not true. A translation of the apparent source of the book of abraham pdf john a. Did egyptologists debunk the book of abraham is a fraud. Ritner, professor of egyptology at the oriental institute, university of chicago, explains. There is thus no possibility that the scenes, reworked from the papyri for the boa, can be considered. For publications before 1923 public domain, please see my documents collection. As people asked what was the source of the book of abraham, there was an immediate assumption made that it was the text that was next to facsimile 1 because you can see on the screen that one of the.
We should begin by asking what segment of the whole body of manuscripts was the source of the book of abraham. Except for those willfully blind, writes professor ritner of the university of chicagos oriental institute, the case is closed. A response to translation and historicity of the book of. Morris notes the following in response to criticism leveled by professor ritner at the book of abraham, furthermore, ritner does not inform his readers that certain elements of the book of abraham also appear in ancient or medieval texts. An examination and comparative study of facsimile no. Ritner provides a thorough overview of what the papyri say, and also explores the history and context out of which the book of abraham emerged. There is a reason why there is not one single respectable nonmormon egyptologist past or present who confirms joseph smiths translations of the papyri and facsimiles. The lds church issued a new article on the book of abraham on its official website in 2014, arguing that it does not matter that the text of the book of abraham does not match the text of the papyri joseph smith said he had translated.
Jsp i includes a vignette, or illustration, that is clearly the basis for facsimile 1 in the book of abraham as well as some accompanying columns of text. Most of the angst over the book of abraham comes from this first assumption and that is an assumption about the source of the book of abraham. Ritner, like before, wants to insist that lds members must believe abraham himself wrote the text, and what we have is a perfect copy of what abraham wrote, and since there are elements in the text after abraham, therefore this book is false. Translation and historicity of the book of abraham.
The evidence suggests that the book of abraham reflects concepts of joseph smiths time and place rather than those of an ancient world. Though a notice printed in the 1 february 1843 issue of the times and seasons suggested that js would publish further extracts from the book of abraham. See brian hauglid, the book of abraham and muslim tradition, in astronomy, papyrus, and covenant, studies in the book of abraham, vol. In this article, egyptologist robert ritner responds to that article. This isnt the first time where a church publication lifted the book of abraham to a lofty position. These papyri comprise the breathing permit of hor, the book of the dead of tasheritmin, the book of the dead chapter 125 of neferirnebu, the book of the dead of amenhotep, and the hypocephalus of sheshonq, as well as some loose. With the book of abraham now confirmed as a perhaps wellmeaning, but erroneous invention by joseph smith, the lds church may well devote some reflection to the status of the text. They served as the basis for joseph smiths book of abraham, published in. The onedutv we oue to hitorv is to rewrte t oscar wllde tile ctrirc a\ at tr, the book of antiphons of the monastery of bangor, ireland, contains a poem about the monastery regimen of which the following quotation is a part. Bruce porter exposes what you need to know about the book of abraham. Not a single word or idea presented by joseph smith even remotely corresponds with the actual translation of the book of. Ritner has concluded that the book of abraham is a perhaps wellmeaning, but erroneous invention by joseph smith.
It is a response to an essay posted on the lds church website titled translation and historicity of the book of abraham. Book of abrahamjoseph smith papyrifacsimilesfacsimile 3. Ritner s conclusion is that the book of abraham text presented by joseph smith could not possibly be more incorrect or more out of place when compared to the real translation of the book of breathings papyri. This is an excellent overview and translation of the joseph smith papyri, which were used to produce the book of abraham, a sacred text in the mormon religion. With the book of abraham now confirmed as a perhaps well meaning, but erroneous invention by joseph smith, the lds church may well. I just wanted to thank everyone over the years for sticking by me and being involved in my little life in my little corner of the world. In 1835, joseph smith, founder of the original mormon church the church of christ purchased several egyptian papyrus scrolls and fragments from the owner of a traveling road show which exhibited egyptian mummies and documents. The references below generally have a direct relationship to the book of abraham, the kirtland egyptian. Ritner s permission for readers who are interested in ongoing discussions surrounding the book of abraham. Robert ritner of the university of chicago coincidentally the same college where james breasted taught recently wrote an attack piece on the book of abraham, filled with all kinds of fallacies and falsehoods. This book marks the publication of the first, full translation of the socalled joseph smith egyptian papyri translated into english. The book of abraham is an evidence of the inspired calling of the prophet joseph smith. Except for those willfully blind, the case is closed. The book of abraham largely follows the biblical narrative but adds important information regarding abrahams life and teachings.
The translation and publication of the smith papyri must be accessible not merely to egyptologists but to nonspecialists within and outside of the lds religious community for. As noted above, most critics have assumed that the source of the text is the hieroglyphs adjacent to facsimile 1 on the papyri, but a closer look at the ancient sources themselves and contemporary accounts of joseph smiths translation process brings that assumption into question. Professor ritner opens with a volley meant to stun. The above donut chart shows percentages of the book of abraham section of letter to a ces director that fairmormon is in agreement, disagreement, and neutral on if one assumes that fairmormons undisputed silence is acceptance of the facts, fairmormon agrees with 90. Ritner concluded in 2014 that the source of the book of abraham is the breathing permit of hor, misunderstood and mistranslated by joseph smith. He even provides the various translations to egyptian writings on top of his own. Ritner 5 early mormonism and the magic world view, 244. Regarding the nature of the works included below, please see my commentary on the book of abraham bibliography. Ritner s response highlights some of the weaknesses in the churchs essay far better than i ever could. The translation and publication of the smith papyri must be accessible not merely to egyptologists but to nonspecialists within and outside of the lds religious community for whom the book of abraham was produced. Ritner the only parallels between the book of abraham and the papyri are found in the facsimiles ptolemaic in date 35230 bce. Furthermore, ritner does not inform his readers that certain elements of the book of abraham also appear in ancient or medieval texts. Farms, 2005, 146, and traditions about the early life of abraham, studies in the book of abraham, vol. Book of abraham mormon stories mormon stories podcast.
In 2011, fair produced a video that provides evidences for and answers to critical questions about the book of abraham. The damning evidence is there for anyone to evaluate. Finally, a highly credible scholar of egyptology wrote a book about the book of abraham and the papyri. John abrahams most popular book is bollywood body by design. Professor ritner s response originally appeared as a pdf document on the universitys oriental institute website. Books by john abraham author of how to get the death you. Ritners response to the book of abraham essay general. With the book of abraham now confirmed as a perhaps wellmeaning, but erroneous invention by joseph smith, the lds church may well. Even before the book of abraham was published in 1842, joseph smith and.
As the bio on the website says, this all started with the ensign article about the joseph smith papers project and snowballed from there. Translation and historicity of the book of abraham university of. The book of abraham and unnoticed assumptions fairmormon. John abraham has 22 books on goodreads with 9 ratings. Illustration 3 ending of papyrus scroll prepared for horus. Ritner, a leading egyptologist at the university of chicago and an expert on the joseph smith papyri, responds to the 2014 article on the book of abraham that appeared on the lds churchs official website. Ritner clarifies that there is no parallel to the book of abrahams intended martyrdom for refusing to worship the images of egyptian gods. Ritner cuts this at the knees, stating that muhlestein intentionally avoids the term human sacrifice in favor of sanctioned killing. I saw this on my facebook feed, curious is people have seen this yet, it is a response by robert ritner specifically to the lds gospel topics essay on the book of abraham. Critical appraisal of the book of abraham wikipedia. Ritner concludes, contrary to the lds position, due to the microfilms being published prior to the rediscovery of the joseph smith papyri, that it is not true that no eyewitness account of the translation survives, that the book of abraham is confirmed as a perhaps wellmeaning, but erroneous invention by joseph smith, and despite its. This bibliography is a continual work in progress last updated on october 10, 2018. Robert ritner also references james breasted in his statement, who as we have already seen was a white supremacist. Book of abraham manuscript, circa julycirca november 1835.
1477 204 1402 764 920 1336 87 1146 1088 1220 1415 899 85 396 293 492 967 786 88 895 1467 686 1439 591 447 1155 757 327 549 504 236 902 1148 253 844 858 1303